Clear retainers.
A thermoformed shell covering the full arch. It is nearly invisible, it holds rotations rigidly, and its limitations are worth knowing before it is prescribed.
Why patients prefer them
Appearance, mostly, and the difference in acceptance is substantial. A patient who will not wear a visible appliance will frequently wear a clear one, and an appliance that is worn outperforms one that is not.
They are also thinner and less intrusive lingually than a Hawley, which means less initial speech disturbance and faster adaptation.
And they hold rotations well, because full coverage engages every surface rather than relying on a labial bow and a baseplate.
What full coverage costs
The occlusal surfaces are covered, so the posterior teeth cannot settle further after treatment. Where the final occlusion would benefit from settling, a clear retainer prevents it.
The material also wears and can distort, particularly in a patient who clenches or grinds. A clear retainer in a bruxer has a short life and may need replacing regularly — or a different approach.
It is not adjustable in any meaningful sense. Where a small correction is wanted, or where the appliance needs modifying as the dentition changes, a Hawley is the more flexible option.
Design considerations
Material thickness affects rigidity, durability and comfort, and heavier material suits a patient who is hard on appliances or where the retention demand is high.
Trim line matters. A scalloped trim following the gingival contour is more comfortable; a straight trim extending slightly onto the gingiva is more retentive. State a preference if you have one.
Where a bonded retainer is present, the clear retainer has to accommodate it without rocking on it — capture it in the record or note its position.
Records are unforgiving
The appliance is formed directly over the model, so any inaccuracy in the model becomes an inaccuracy in the appliance. There is no design stage in which an error can be corrected.
The record must capture full clinical crowns and the interproximal regions, because retention comes from engaging undercuts. A model short at the gingival margins produces a retainer that lifts.
Distortion in an alginate impression left before pouring is the usual culprit in a retainer that does not seat. Scan or pour promptly.
Care and replacement
Clear material distorts with heat permanently. A retainer that has been through a dishwasher, soaked in hot water, or left in a car will not seat again — and that is the single most useful instruction to give a patient.
Clean with cool water and a soft brush, avoid abrasive pastes and alcohol-based rinses, and store dry in a ventilated case rather than wrapped in a serviette, which is how most are thrown away.
Expect replacement over the years. Keeping the record makes it straightforward provided the teeth have not moved.
Using them as a template
A clear retainer taken from the post-treatment record is also a record of the result, and it can be used to make replacements, to fabricate a bleaching tray, or as a reference if relapse occurs.
Keeping the model or the digital file makes all of that straightforward. Practices that discard the record after the first retainer end up taking a new impression every time one is lost.
Where the retainer is also going to serve as a bleaching tray, say so — the trim line and any reservoir requirement differ.
What to put on the prescription
Clear retainer, the arch, the material thickness if you have a preference, and the trim line — scalloped or straight.
Note any bonded retainer present, any restorations that affect undercut, and whether the patient shows evidence of parafunction, since that affects both material choice and the expected life of the appliance.
More in Orthodontic Laboratory
Send a case
Digital scans and conventional impressions are both accepted. Cases move by UPS and Purolator, and Fairmont works with practices throughout British Columbia and across Canada.